http://www.pitbullarmory.com/Squirrel-armor.html
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Monday, August 4, 2008
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Speaking of people that are spoiled...
Anyway. While shedding very little light on the quality of the movies themselves, the reviews shed a lot of light on the public. They're spoiled. These people are renting low-budget horror movies and expecting better than average acting, impressive plot (including twists), and a score to die for. Granted, there have been some quality horror movies in the past few years (Hostel, Hostel II, High Tension, Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, etc.). These movies were impressive (partially because of such a low expectation going in), but they are, by and large, the exceptions and have quite possibly spoiled the audience. Most horror movies you find in a store that refuses to carry NC-17 movies are going to be cheap, quickly made, and sensationalized.
I really don't want to hear someone whine about the "B-rated music" when I'm looking at a cheap horror movie. I expect a B-rated score, if not worse. If they want to whine about B-rated music in an Oscar-nominated film, be my guest. That makes sense.
I go into a cheap horror film expecting a mediocre film. If it's better than that, I am simply happily surprised. Example, the movie Teeth. I expected it to be a less than impressive, cheap thrill, possibly less than fulfilling. I was pleasantly surprised and enjoyed the movie more for that. (Another surprisingly good one was Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon.)
The only helpful reviews I found were basically this: "Not as advertised! Camera cuts away right before the bloody part! Not enough gore! Boring!" To these people, I say: thank you. They are the ones who are willing to admit why they rented that movie in the first place: horror. Not a hint of horror, not an implication of horror, not alluding to horror, but actual horror.
Monday, July 28, 2008
Some people must not care about appearances, even if they happen to be part of their jobs.
So, I wrote to my congressman (yes, I am serious) because I am becoming slightly pushy in my advocacies. I wrote an email asking said congressman to please support a bill against the destruction of the Polar Bear Seas that would occur if we drilled for oil within them. I pointed out how drilling would only reduce oil prices by pennies, is a short-term solution to a long-term problem, that we should be supporting more research into finding a long-term solution, and for that little gain that would come from drilling, we would be wiping out a magnificent species. I wrote how I wanted future generations to know a life with polar bears in the wild, not just in a zoo. This is the response I got:Dear XXXX:
Thank you for contacting me regarding your support of offshore oil drilling. It is good to hear your thoughts on this important issue, and I appreciate the opportunity to share my views with you.
Many of my colleagues and I have been pushing for solutions to the nation's energy crisis, including increasing the U.S. oil production in areas such as the Outer Continental Shelf and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. However, Democrat leaders have consistently blamed the Administration, while ignoring the voice of the public.
Yet, with the President's decision to lift the executive ban of oil and natural gas drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf, they cannot continue that act. Now the next step is to lift the freeze that Congress enacted in 1982, in order to expand drilling. Despite support from Republicans and some moderate Democrats, the House leadership has held no hearings on the issue, and even shut down the budget process in order to deny Republicans the opportunity to force a vote on domestic drilling.
I fully support expanding offshore drilling. However, it seems the Democrat leaders are content with a continuation of purchasing America's oil from the Middle East. With the expansion of drilling, the Outer Continental Shelf could provide over 86 billion barrels of oil for our nation.
You can be assured that I am committed to alleviating consumers from the rising burden of the high costs of gasoline, and will protect the interests of the 5th District when making decisions about energy policy in Congress.
Again, thank you for contacting me regarding this important issue. I will keep your concerns and thoughts in mind as I vote on future legislation on this matter. Please continue to keep me informed of the issues important to you and your family.
Fail. FAIL. My support of off-shore oil drilling? Really? I am still working on a reply adequate enough to fully point out the idiocy of this response. I could not have been more clear about my position in the original email. Considering this congressman's views, I would not have supported him anyway, but now I am actively against him. And I vote. And bombard him with emails.Thursday, July 24, 2008
Regarding my previous post...
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
As I am rarely satisfied...
I never thought I would be one of those people that have nothing in life but work. I miss my old life. I do not want this, but I'm stuck.
The Real World...


